Tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases in cats

Several species of mycobacteria can cause disease in veterinary species, being either primary pathogens, or becoming pathogenic under certain circumstances.

Tuberculosis can be caused by a number of different, but closely related, bacteria. Relevant members of the tuberculosis complex group include Mycobacterium (M.) tuberculosis, M. bovis and M. microti. M. tuberculosis causes over 90% of tuberculosis in man, but rarely infects other mammals, except for dogs. M. bovis is themain cause of tuberculosis in cattle. It can also infect various other mammals, including humans, dogs, cats, deer, llama and pigs. M. microti causes tuberculosis in voles and cats (in the latter it was previously termed M. microti-like and has culture characteristics between M. tuberculosis and M. bovis). M. avium causes tuberculosis in birds, and can also infect man, dogs and cats. This is a member of the M. avium-intracellulare complex (MAC) and these organisms are mainly saprophytic: however, they are often considered with the tuberculosis complex because they can cause clinical disease indistinguishable from that caused by members of this group.

Other potentially pathogenic mycobacteria include M. lepraemurium, which causes leprosy in rats, and a similar, or possibly the same, organism which may be one of the cause feline leprosy. Opportunistic non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are usually saprophytic, but a number of species have been reported to cause disease in cats. These include M. chelonae-abscessus, M. fortuitum / peregrinum group, M. smegmatis, M. phlei, M. genavense, M. simiae, M. thermoresistible, M, flavescens, M. xenopi, M. alvei and M. terrae complex.

Mycobacterial syndromes seen in cats therefore include tuberculosis, feline leprosy and NTM mycobacteriosis. All three syndromes have been reported in the UK, where the majority of cases appear to be cutaneous in nature. All three syndromes can present with nodules, draining tracts and/or ulceration. In some cases, the disease may become generalised secondary to skin inoculation, but only occasional cases present with primary systemic disease. Where systemic disease is seen, infection with a member of the tuberculosis group or a MAC organism is most likely, although occasional cases have been seen with NTM. In many cases of feline mycobacteriosis, infection can be related to percutaneous injury, contamination via soil or the presence of devitalised tissue. These factors tend to be reflected in the distribution of the lesions.

CLINICAL BACKGROUND:
Epidemiology and aetiopathogenesis:
In cats, tuberculosis has classically been described as being caused by M. bovis. Historically,infection resulted from the ingestion of milk from tuberculous cattle. With the significant reduction of tuberculosis from the national herd, and the pasteurisation of milk, there has been a marked decline in the prevalence of the disease seen in cats.

Currently, tuberculosis in cats is recognised infrequently. When it is diagnosed it is usually caused by infection with either the cattle form of the infection (M. bovis) or the vole form (M. microti). Data from the Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA) shows of the 337 Ziehl Neelsen (ZN)-positive feline samples they received during 2005-7, and where the culture results are available (which is all but 18); M. microti 19%, M. bovis 12%, M. avium 7%, M. malmonoense 1%, unclassified mycobacterium 4%, negative culture 55%. Therefore, a positive culture was only gained in 45%, with 12% of the infections being due to M. bovis and 19% to M. microti. Infection of cats with M. tuberculosis is incredibly rare, probably because cats are naturally very resistant to it. (Interestingly, this is quite different from the picture seen in humans; where over 90% of cases result from infection with M. tuberculosis, approximately 1% is caused by M. bovis, and disease due to M. microti is incredibly rare).

The current epidemiology of tuberculosis in cats is unclear. Few cases are believed to relate to direct infection from cattle. This is because when tuberculosis is gained by drinking contaminated cows milk the infection settles within the cat’s intestines, and disease results in diarrhoea and weight loss. It is probably because almost all cows’ milk is now pasteurised that this type of tuberculosis is very rare. The tuberculosis that we now see most frequently in cats affects their skin; where it causes sores and lumps that fail to heal. This is often associated with swollen lymph nodes, especially those under the chin, and some cases show only swollen lymph nodes. In chronic cases, where the infection has spread to the cat’s lungs, they may develop a soft cough or have difficulty breathing.

It is important to try to determine how cats are becoming infected. If we look into possible risk factors we find that most of the cats are keen hunters, regularly catching small rodents. Interestingly, studies have shown that in the UK wild mice and voles can carry M. microti, and the same species and a wide range of other animals in the salvatic reservoir (e.g. foxes, stoats, moles, rats and deer) can carry M. bovis. It is therefore most likely that cats become infected by hunting small wild rodents. This also accounts for the distribution of the skin lesions seen on these cats, which occur most frequently on the face and legs, i.e. the areas most likely to be bitten when playing with prey. In some areas of Britain M. bovis has become endemic in badgers. While cats and badgers rarely interact directly, there may be a potential risk for cats to become infected via local environmental contamination. M. bovis can also be endemically present in many other species of free-ranging wildlife, e.g. deer; so the risk of feline infection may vary in each country dependent on the likely interaction between these species and domestic cats.

All members of the tuberculosis complex pose potential zoonotic risks. However, to date, there have been no reported cases of cats passing tuberculosis onto humans. By far the greatest tuberculosis risk to humans is spending time with infected humans or, less frequently, handling infected cattle. M. tuberculosis and M. bovis can both cause reverse zoonoses and there have been a small number of cases where humans have infected their cats (with M. bovis).

Predisposition:
Most cases of feline tuberculosis are probably sub-clinical in nature. Infection usually occurs after protracted exposure, e.g. repeated exposure to infected small mammals, living on a farm housing tuberculous cattle, or living for prolonged periods with infected humans or poultry. Tuberculosis is therefore seen mainly in adult cats, and interestingly, is seen most commonly in males. No evidence of immunosuppression has been found and those cats tested for FIV and FeLV have usually been negative. Certain breeds of cat appear to be predisposed to infection with MAC organisms, including Siamese, Abyssinian and Somali breeds.

Clinical signs:
Depending on the route of infection, affected cats may present with systemic signs related to the alimentary, and/or respiratory tracts, or with localised disease affecting the skin. Currently, the most usual presentation for tuberculosis in cats is the cutaneous form, with respiratory and alimentary forms being seen less frequently.

In the cutaneous form the lesions probably arise from infected bite wounds, local spread or haematogenous dissemination to the skin. The lesions often involve the face, extremities, tail base or perineum, i.e. "fight and bite sites". Less frequently they involve the ventral thorax. They generally take the form of firm, raised, dermal nodules, ulceration, or non-healing wounds with draining sinus tracts. Extension of granulomatous tissue may in some cases involve the subcutaneous structures, muscle and/or bone. Skin lesions are commonly associated with either local or generalised lymphadenopathy. On occasion, submandibular or prescapular lymphadenopathy may be the only clinical finding.

When the infection spreads to the lungs, or where it is acquired through inhalation, tubercles arise in the lungs and/or hilar lymph nodes and affected cats present with weight loss, anorexia, dyspnoea and coughing.

In the alimentary form, tubercles arise in the intestines and/or mesenteric lymph nodes. Affected cats commonly develop intestinal malabsorption and present with weight loss, anaemia, vomiting and diarrhoea. Occasionally tubercles arise in the tonsils, resulting in signs of oropharangeal disease.

A range of clinical signs may be seen with disseminated disease. These include splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, pleural or pericardial effusions, generalised lymphadenopathy, weight loss and fever. Lameness may result from bone involvement. Granulomatous uveitis and signs referable to central nervous system involvement have been seen in some cases.

Diagnostic Techniques:
Non-specific tests: A thorough evaluation of the patient is necessary to assess the extent of local infection and the degree of systemic involvement. Changes in serum biochemistry and haematology, if present, are non-specific and vary with the severity of the disease. However, hypercalcaemia has been seen in a number of cases and appears to correlate with a poorer prognosis. Radiography can be useful in the appraisal of lung involvement. However, changes are very variable and include tracheo-bronchial lymphadenopathy, interstitial or miliary lung infiltration, localised lung consolidation, or pleural effusion. Abdominal radiography may reveal hepato- or splenomegaly, abdominal masses, mineralised mesenteric lymph nodes, or ascites. Bone lesions tend to consist of areas of bony lysis and sclerosis, osteoarthritis, discospondylitis or periostitis.

Specific tests: Specific tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis have been investigated in cats, but have generally proved unhelpful. Unlike other species, cats do not react strongly to intra-dermally administered tuberculin and the results from intra-dermal skin testing are unreliable. Tests for specific serum antibody responses have also proved unhelpful.

To confirm mycobacterial involvement, aspirates and/or biopsy samples of affected tissue should be stained with Ziehl Neelsen (ZN) or other specific special stains. The number of acid fast bacilli seen within affected macrophages may be variable, depending on the species of mycobacteria involved, the location of the granuloma and, probably most importantly, the nature of the cat's immune response. While finding acid fast bacilli confirms the presence of mycobacteria, it is important to culture the organism to determine the exact species involved. Once the species has been identified it is possible to evaluate zoonotic risk, potential sources of infection, and feasible treatment options. Unfortunately, many samples that are seen to have ZN positive organisms fail to culture positive, and even those that do typically take approximately two months. While molecular PCR techniques are now available, and can be considered where tissue for culture is not available, they are expensive, and have still to be perfected (see end for details).

Correct handling of biopsy material:
In practice, this usually involves taking a biopsy from a case where mycobacterial disease is only one of a large number of possible differential diagnoses. If in-house facilities are available for ZN staining, this can be performed on aspirates or biopsy impression smears. However, in most cases biopsy material must be sent to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory. It is practical to collect the biopsy, cut it into three pieces, fix one in formalin for histopathological examination and ZN staining and, pending results, place one in a sterile container and freeze it. Where other bacterial infections are suspected, the third sample should be sent unfixed for routine bacterial culture at which time ZN staining can also be requested. This way, if the sample is found to have ZN positive organisms, the frozen portion can be defrosted and sent to the Veterinary Laboratories Agency (or a Mycobacterial Reference Laboratory) for specialist culture (see end of text for addresses).

Until the organism has been properly characterised, it should be considered a potential human pathogen.

Whenever handling potentially tuberculous material it is necessary to take certain precautions. In the UK, the law dealing with material KNOWN to be tuberculous is very exact and requires the use of specialist laboratories. However, the law relating to material taken from animals where tuberculosis is only one of a number of possible differentials is different. In the latter case routine aseptic practices are generally adequate, although gloves should be worn when handling either the biopsy site or the biopsy material.

Under the Tuberculosis Orders currently in force in England, Wales, and Scotland, the identification of M. bovis in clinical or pathological samples taken from any mammal (except humans) is notifiable to the Veterinary Laboratories Agency (see end of text for the address). This, of course, includes domestic cats and other felines. The same Orders impose a duty on any veterinary surgeon who suspects tuberculosis in a domestic cat to immediately notify the Divisional Veterinary Manager at the local office of the State Veterinary Service. When a confirmed case is euthanased it is advisable to have the body cremated. For DEFRA Guidance notes on Tuberculosis in cats go to: CatsTBbriefing (VIPER23 App Y5)_March 08 update.doc

Histopathology:
Histopathology of affected tissue generally reveals granulomatous inflammation, with foamy macrophages containing variable numbers of acid fast bacilli.

MANAGEMENT:
Interim Management: Deciding to treat a case of suspected feline tuberculosis is always contentious. Before undertaking treatment it is important to address a number of points:

Pending a definitive diagnosis, interim therapy with a fluoroquinolone has previously been recommended. However, this should only be considered in cases of localized cutaneous infection. It is more sensible to recommend that double or triple therapy be initiated (Table 1). This not only gives the best chance of clinical resolution, but also decreases the potential for the mycobacteria to develop resistance to the fluoroquinolone. This is an important consideration since generating drug resistance will be detrimental not only to the individual cat, but may also endanger human patients.

Before deciding on continued treatment it is highly desirable to know exactly which form of mycobacteria is responsible. This is because it is strongly inadvisable to continue treating a cat with M. tuberculosis or disseminated M. bovis (and UK and Scottish law dictates that M. bovis infection is notifiable). Unfortunately, in many cases it is not possible to culture organisms from tissue samples that have been seen to have positive ZN staining. Because of this is it essential to counsel owners very carefully, making them aware of all of the potential risks and complications.

Treatment of choice:
Ideally, anti-tuberculosis treatment should consist of an initial and a continuation phase. The initial phase usually requires at least three drugs and lasts for two months, while the continuation phase requires two drugs and lasts for perhaps a further four months, depending on the type and extent of the disease. In those cats where triple therapy is not feasible, treatment should still involve at least two drugs and should be given for a minimum of six to nine months.

Traditionally, the rifampicin-isoniazid-ethambutol combination has been considered the most effective regime for the treatment of tuberculosis in animals. However, some newer and less toxic drugs are worth appraisal. The fluoroquinolones, e.g. marbofloxacin, have potential in the treatment of feline tuberculosis, as well as opportunistic mycobacteriosis. However, they often do not appear to be effective against MAC infection, except possibly when some of the newer preparations are used, e.g. moxifloxacin. When treating MAC infections the best results have been gained when clarithromycin has been included in the treatment regimen. Clarithromycin is a modern macrolide which is used in the treatment of human tuberculosis; it appears to be effective in cats with mycobacterial infection, especially when given in combination with rifampicin and/or another antibiotic as per culture e.g. doxycyclin. A potentially useful once daily alternative to clarithromycin is azithromycin, although it may not be as effective. To date, the only side effect seen with clarithromycin treatment has been pinnal or more generalised erythema which resolves on discontinuation of the drug. From clinical experience gained over the past 10 years we recommend treatment consisting of an initial phase of rifampicin-fluoroquinolone-clarithromycin/azithromycin, followed by a continuation phase of rifampicin and either fluoroquinolone or clarithromycin/azithromycin (Table 1).

In cases where resistance develops, the rifampicin-isoniazid-ethambutol combination may be considered. If necessary, ethambutol can be substituted with dihydrostreptomycin or pyrazinamide. However, where M. bovis has been confirmed, pyrazinamide is not recommended due to the organism’s natural resistance. Rifampicin and isoniazid are more effective and less toxic than ethambutol and dihydrostreptomycin and consequently are more appropriate choices if only two drugs are required.

Prognosis:
The prognosis depends on the type of mycobacteria involved, and the extent and severity of the infection. While many cases, especially those caused by M. microti infection, have responded favourably to treatment, and have achieved apparent cure or long-term remission, the prognosis should always be stated as guarded.

CLINICAL BACKGROUND:
Epidemiology and aetiopathogenesis:
Infection with M. lepraemurium is largely assumed as the organism cannot be cultured using standard techniques. However, recent reports from Australia show that feline leprosy can take one of two different forms and that while disease in younger cats does appear to be caused by M. lepraemurium; the disease seen in older cats appears to be caused by a novel, but as yet undefined, mycobacterial species. Infection is believed to be gained by the introduction of the organisms through bite wounds from rodents. However, this is not proven and it is also possible that infection is gained via soil contamination of cutaneous wounds. As yet, there is no known zoonotic potential for this disease.

Predisposition:
There is no breed or gender predisposition but adult cats are more often affected. The prevalence of feline leprosy is higher in areas with a temperate maritime climate, e.g. Australia, New Zealand, Europe (UK, the Channel Islands, the Netherlands), western Canada and western parts of the USA (California, Oregon).

Clinical signs:
Feline leprosy is primarily a cutaneous syndrome. Single or multiple nodules, which may be haired, alopecic or ulcerated, may be seen on the head, limbs and occasionally the trunk. They are non-painful and freely mobile. Regional lymphadenopathy may be present but systemic disease is rare. In Australia this disease appears to have two different forms: one type affecting young cats, which initially develop localised nodular, often ulcerated, lesions on the limbs, which progress rapidly, while the other type affects older cats, which develop more generalized skin involvement with no ulceration and a slower clinical progression.

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES:
Cytology and histopathology (with the use of special stains) are the major methods of diagnosis. In young cats there are typically few acid fast organisms present. However, in older cats the lesions often contain large numbers of acid fast organisms, which can be clearly seen within macrophages. Culture is usually unrewarding, but should be performed in all suspect cases as the clinical signs and histopathology of feline leprosy can mimic those of feline tuberculosis. Molecular PCR techniques are currently being investigated and do show promise. The diagnostic approach discussed previously for tuberculosis should be followed.

MANAGEMENT:
Interim management: A fluoroquinolone (Table 1.) should be used pending diagnosis.
Treatment of choice: Surgical removal of small nodules is recommended. Clofazamine (Table 1.) has been used in a limited number of cases where surgical removal was difficult. Dapsone is considered too toxic for use in cats.

CLINICAL BACKGROUND:
Epidemiology and aetiopathogenesis:
This syndrome is caused by saprophytic, usually non-pathogenic, organisms which are found in soil, water and decaying vegetation. The "fast growing" representatives of this mycobacterial group are most commonly implicated in feline skin disease. However, as our ability to recognise the implications of "bite site" lesions improves, along with our access to the expertise of the specialist laboratories, slow growing variants are being recognised more frequently, as they are in human medicine.

The following organisms have been implicated in causing this syndrome; M. chelonae-abscessus, M. fortuitum / peregrinum group, M. smegmatis and M. phlei. Other NTM that have also been found causing disease in cats include M. genavense, M. simiae, M. thermoresistible, M. flavescens, M. xenopi, M. malmoense, M. alvei and M. terrae complex. All of these organisms can cause disease through contamination of cutaneous wounds and are particularly pathogenic if inoculated into adipose tissue. Entry through the gastrointestinal or respiratory tracts is rare.

Predisposition:
In general, cats appear to be predisposed to infection with this group of mycobacteria. Adult cats with a hunting or fighting lifestyle are more likely to be affected. Disease caused by these organisms is rarely reported in the UK and appears more common in tropical and subtropical areas of the world. However, difficulties associated with diagnosis may influence its true prevalence. Unlike the situation in humans, immunosuppression has only been found in a small number of the affected cats.

Clinical signs:
Many of the different species of NTMproduce similar clinical syndromes. The most common of which is typified by panniculitis, where multiple, punctate draining tracts occur with a "salt and pepper shaker” appearance. These are associated with subcutaneous nodules and coalescence produces large areas of ulcerated, non-healing tissue. Affected areas can be extremely painful. The inguinal fat pads, flanks and the tail base are affected most frequently. However, any area may be affected if it is prone to injury (and has sufficient subcutaneous fat). The lesions may be exacerbated by surgery and dehiscence associated with satellite lesions is common. Although systemic spread is rare, fever, anorexia and reluctance to move may be seen. Primary pulmonary infection with M. fortuitum and dissiminated infections with M. smegmatis and M. xenopi have been reported and may have arisen from non-cutaneous routes of entry.

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES:
Histopathology:
Pyogranulomatous panniculitis is seen and should automatically warrant a search for mycobacteria. These organisms are difficult to identify in histopathological sections even when acid fast stained, but the use of modified Fite’s or rapid ZN methods will increase the sensitivity of detection.

Culture:
Culture from a biopsy specimen is the diagnostic test of choice. Some of the organisms are relatively easy to grow on Lowenstein Jensen media, but molecular PCR techniques are also currently being investigated.

MANAGEMENT:
Interim management: A fluoroquinolone is the drug of choice while waiting for culture.
Treatment of choice:
This is controversial and evaluation of the individual case is required. Ideally, antimicrobial therapy should be determined by culture and sensitivity. This is because different species of NTM have differing sensitivity patterns. One paper showed M. chelonae-abscessus and M. fortuitum were sensitive to amikacin (100%), cefoxitin (94%), ciprofloxacin (75% - presume other fluoquinolones are similar), clarithromycin (71%) and doxycycline (29%). M. smegmatis is usually sensitive to fluoquinolones, and M. xenopi may be sensitive to fluoquinolones, clarithromycin, rifampicin and clofazimine. It is possible that double or triple therapy with a combination of fluoquinolone, clarithromycin or azithromycin, and/or rifampicin should be considered as for the tuberculosis syndromes (Table 1.). Antibiotic therapy should be continued for protracted periods of time, i.e. six to twelve weeks. Surgical intervention should be radical and planned with the same precision as removing a locally invasive neoplasm. Antibiotic therapy in combination with surgery has been recommended.

Prognosis:
Prognosis is poor to guarded. The prognosis deteriorates further when there have been previous unsuccessful attempts at surgery.

Table 1. Potentially useful drugs for the treatment of feline mycobacterial disease.

Uses	Drug	Dose mg/kg	Interval h	Toxicity
1st line tx for TB & NTMa	Marbofloxacin	2 per os	24	Retinal degeneration.
1st line tx for TB	Rifampicinb	10-20 per os	12-24	Hepatotoxicity, induction of liver enzymes, discoloration of body fluids.
1st line tx for TB	Clarithromycinbc Azithromycin	5-15 per os 7-15 per os	12 24	Pinnal or generalised erythema.
2nd line tx for TB	Isoniazidb	10-20 per os	24	Hepatotoxicity, peripheral neuritis.
2nd line tx for TB	Dihydro -streptomycinb	15 im	24	Ototoxicity.
2nd line tx for TBd	Pyrazinamideb	15-40 per os	24	Hepatotoxicity.
2nd line tx for TB	Ethambutolb	15 per os	24	Optic neuritis.
Tx for leprosy and MAC	Clofazaminebe	4-8 (occ. ~10) per os	24	Hepatotoxicity, G-I signs, discoloration of body fluids, photosensitization.
2nd line tx for NTM	Doxycycline Amikacin Cefoxitin	5-10 per os 10-15 iv im sc 30-40 iv im sc	12 24 6-8	G-I signs Nephrotoxic, ototoxic Pain on injection im sc

tx - treatment, TB - tuberculosis, im – intramuscularly, sc – subcutaneously, non-tuberculous mycobacteria – NTM. aNot effective against MAC infection. bThese drugs are not licensed for use in cats. cDoses are extrapolated from human recommendations since there is little information published relating to the use of clarithromycin in the cat. Particularly useful when treating MAC infections. dNot effective against M. bovis infection. eCan be difficult to obtain. Second line treatments for tuberculosis should be reserved for resistant infections only. Drugs licensed for human use can be obtained by veterinary prescription from larger chemists.

Useful addresses in the UK:
Danièlle Gunn-Moore,
Professor of Feline Medicine,
University of Edinburgh Small Animal Hospital,
Easterbush Veterinary Centre, Roslin,
Midlothian, Scotland, EH25 9RG
Tel: 0131 650 7650
Email: Danielle.Gunn-Moore@ed.ac.uk

Andrea Harvey, Feline Fellow,
Feline Centre, Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies,
University of Bristol Veterinary School,
Langford House, Langford,
North Somerset, BS40 5DU
Tel: 0117 920 9578
Email: A.M.Harvey@bristol.ac.uk

Rachel Dean,
The Animal Health Trust,
Centre for Small Animal Studies,
Lanwades Park,
Kentford,
Newmarket,
Suffolk,
CB8 7UU
Tel: 01638 750659 ext 1228
Email: rachel.dean@aht.org.uk

Please contact any of these people to discuss the case in more detail. We are currently trying to collate all of the cases in cats in the UK so that we can gain a better understanding of the presentation, causes, and treatment responses of the condition.

All potential cases should be reported to the VLA. The VLA is currently willing to undertake mycobacterial culture free of charge in cases where the history, clinical signs and/or histopathological findings are suggestive of mycobacterial infection. Please contact Mr. Jahans prior to sending samples to ensure appropriate samples are submitted, and enclose case details when submitting samples:

Mr. Keith Jahans, TB Diagnostic Laboratory,
Veterinary Laboratories Agency (DEFRA) - Weybridge,
New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB.
Telephone number: 01932 357280
Email: k.jahans@vla.defra.gsi.gov.uk

Where it is impossible to collect a sample for culture, it may be possible to confirm the presence of mycobacteria and whether or not the organism is a member of the tuberculosis complex by PCR test performed on formalin-fixed tissue (although a fresh unfixed tissue sample is always referred). However, the tests are expensive, and culture is preferable. [Costs as of April 1 2007: Routine Tb PCR and mycobacterium detection £159+vat; identification of atypical mycobacterium a further £130.50+vat; cost of differentiating members of the tuberculosis complex a further £213+vat]. Results are usually available within a week of specimen receipt. Please contact the laboratory prior to sending samples to ensure appropriate samples are submitted.
Contact details immediately below:

Dr Deborah Gascoyne-Binzi
Principal Clinical Scientist, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust,
Department of Microbiology, The General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX
Tel: 0113 392 3929 (Laboratory: 0113 392 8797)
Fax: 0113 343 5649
Email: Deborah.Gascoyne-Binzi@leedsth.nhs.uk.

Contact the FAB for more information on tuberculosis in cats, and information on what to do if you have a suspected case:
Feline Advisory Bureau,
Taeselbury, High Street,
Tisbury, Wiltshire, SP3 6LD
Tel: +44(0)1747 871872
Fax: 01747 871873
Email: information@fabcats.org
Web site: www.fabcats.org

INTRODUCTION